{"id":5308,"date":"2020-11-05T09:24:58","date_gmt":"2020-11-05T09:24:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dgsociety.org\/?page_id=5308"},"modified":"2020-11-05T09:27:50","modified_gmt":"2020-11-05T09:27:50","slug":"past-special-issues-and-best-paper-awards","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/dgsociety.org\/egov-2021\/past-special-issues-and-best-paper-awards\/","title":{"rendered":"Past Special issues and best paper awards"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row][vc_column width=&#8221;1\/4&#8243;][vc_wp_custommenu nav_menu=&#8221;116&#8243;][\/vc_column][vc_column width=&#8221;3\/4&#8243;][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<h2>2020<\/h2>\n<p class=\"x_MsoNormal\">Best paper awards <i>winners<\/i> EGOV2020<\/p>\n<ul type=\"disc\">\n<li class=\"x_MsoNormal\">Leif Skiftenes Flak and Sara Hofmann \u2013\u00a0The impact of smart city initiatives on human rights<\/li>\n<li class=\"x_MsoNormal\">Mecati Mariachiara, Flavio Emanuele Cannav\u00f2, Antonio Vetr\u00f2 and Marco Torchiano \u2013\u00a0Evaluating Risk of Discrimination in Automated Decision Making Systems with Measures of Disproportion<\/li>\n<li class=\"x_MsoNormal\">Devin Diran and Anne Fleur van Veenstra \u2013\u00a0Barriers to Data-driven Policy Making for the Municipal Energy Transition in the Netherlands<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"x_MsoNormal\">Best paper <i>nominees<\/i> EGOV2020<\/p>\n<p class=\"x_MsoPlainText\">Category 1<\/p>\n<p class=\"x_MsoPlainText\">\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Manuel Pedro Rodr\u00edguez Bol\u00edvar, Cristina Alcaide Mu\u00f1oz and Laura Alcaide Mu\u00f1oz &#8211; Identifying Strategic Planning Patterns of Smart Initiatives. An Empirical Research in Spanish Smart Cities<\/p>\n<p class=\"x_MsoPlainText\">\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Peter Kuhn and Dian Balta &#8211; Service Quality through Government Proactivity: The Concept of Non-Interaction<\/p>\n<p class=\"x_MsoPlainText\">\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Johan Lin\u00e5ker and Per Runeson &#8211; Collaboration in Open Government DataEcosystems: Open Cross-sector Sharing and Co-development of Data and Software<\/p>\n<p class=\"x_MsoPlainText\">Category 2<\/p>\n<p class=\"x_MsoPlainText\">\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Muhammad Afzal and Panos Panagiotopoulos &#8211; Smart Policing: A Critical Review of the Literature<\/p>\n<p class=\"x_MsoPlainText\">Category 3<\/p>\n<p class=\"x_MsoPlainText\">\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Willem Pieterson and Cindy Weng &#8211; Measure what matters. A dual outcome service quality model for government service delivery<\/p>\n<p class=\"x_MsoPlainText\">\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Karin Skill and Ahmed Kaharevic &#8211; \u00a0eHealth in the Hood: Exploring digital participation in a Swedish suburb<\/p>\n<h2>2019<\/h2>\n<p>This issue 12(1) of JeDEM comprises the keynote papers and a selection of papers nominated for the Best Paper Award at the IFIP EGOV-CeDEM-ePart conference 2019, as well as ongoing submissions.-\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jedem.org\/index.php\/jedem\/issue\/view\/55\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/jedem.org\/index.php\/jedem\/issue\/view\/55<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>2018<\/h2>\n<p>This issue 10(2) of JeDEM comprises the keynote papers and a selection of papers nominated for the Best Paper Award at the IFIP EGOV-CeDEM-ePart conference 2019, as well as ongoing submissions.-\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jedem.org\/index.php\/jedem\/issue\/view\/52\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/jedem.org\/index.php\/jedem\/issue\/view\/52<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row][vc_column width=&#8221;1\/4&#8243;][vc_wp_custommenu nav_menu=&#8221;116&#8243;][\/vc_column][vc_column width=&#8221;3\/4&#8243;][vc_column_text] 2020 Best paper awards winners EGOV2020 Leif Skiftenes Flak and Sara Hofmann \u2013\u00a0The impact of smart city initiatives on human rights Mecati Mariachiara, Flavio Emanuele Cannav\u00f2, Antonio Vetr\u00f2 and Marco Torchiano \u2013\u00a0Evaluating Risk of Discrimination in Automated Decision Making Systems with Measures of Disproportion Devin Diran and Anne Fleur van Veenstra [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":596,"featured_media":0,"parent":4284,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pagelayer_contact_templates":[],"_pagelayer_content":"","iawp_total_views":6,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-5308","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dgsociety.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5308"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dgsociety.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dgsociety.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dgsociety.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/596"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dgsociety.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5308"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dgsociety.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5308\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dgsociety.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4284"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dgsociety.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5308"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}