[vc_row][vc_column width=”1\/4″][vc_wp_custommenu nav_menu=”129″][\/vc_column][vc_column width=”3\/4″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n
[\/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/2″][vc_single_image image=”5960″ img_size=”full” add_caption=”yes” alignment=”center”][vc_column_text]Title: Blockchain, its Applications: the Past, the Present and the Future Possibilities and Challenges for Governments<\/b>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n
Olivier Rikken – Ledger Leopold<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Bio:<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0Olivier Rikken MSc MBA is an often asked\u00a0 keynote speaker on blockchain, Smart Contracts and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs). Throughout his career he worked in various industries, always in roles responsible for both business strategy and reorganization\/process improvement on the one hand and IT development on the other. He advises various companies and blockchain start-ups and is very actively involved in the Dutch Blockchain Coalition, the ISO world standardization group on blockchain, is affiliated to Delft University of Technology where he researches the Governance of DAOs and teaches at various universities worldwide as (guest) lecturer. With Ledger Leopard, he builds and implements various blockchain solutions in industries and governments. Besides that, he is Board Member of the 2token foundation, researching the regulatory side and possibilities and challenges of tokenization. Finally he chairs the EuroStableCoin workgroup in the Netherlands.<\/p>\n Abstract:\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>Blockchain, although often predominately associated with cryptocurrencies, can be seen as a core technology that entails many more application possibilities. Smart Contract Applications, Evidence and Provenance Uses and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations can offer many opportunities for both Industry as well as Governments, but (large scale) implementations also run into various challenges. During this keynote, Olivier Rikken will go over the core technology, its possible applications and various examples of implementations and challenges faced during implementation and challenges for future growth and applications in the Government Sector.<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/2″][vc_single_image image=”5959″ img_size=”full” add_caption=”yes” alignment=”center”][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n Title: Data protection is innocent! Why can\u2019t we really have data for our AI?<\/strong><\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n Dan Bogdanov, PhD – Chief Scientific Officer at Cybernetica<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Bio<\/em><\/strong>:<\/em>\u00a0Dr. Dan Bogdanov met his first significant privacy challenges while working with the data collection systems of the Estonian Genome Foundation. This pain inspired him to start researching cryptographic solutions for privacy problems. He is the inventor of Sharemind, a secure multi-party computation system for collecting, sharing and processing private data. Sharemind is a new kind of computer that analyses digital data without seeing the individual values. This achieves beyond-the-state-of-the-art data protection, as has been demonstrated in various applications processing tax, education, genomic and financial data. He\u00a0has a\u00a0 deep and practical experience in understanding the power of data along with the importance of individual and corporate privacy, governmental data security and integrity. He is now working on digital identities as the Chief Scientific Officer at Cybernetica.<\/p>\n Abstract<\/em><\/strong>: Data protection regulation often gets blamed for stifling innovation. This is a bit unfair, as even when we manage to solve the protection of actual data with, e.g., privacy enhancing technologies, other things can still prevent our cool AI application from happening. Is the data really there? Who should cover the cost of bringing it into use? Or, most importantly, should we even be building this application? I\u2019ll illustrate these topics with three stories of intriguing government data analysis projects where the privacy problems were solved, but other problems turned out to be the blockers.<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/4″][vc_column_text]8.00- 9.00<\/strong>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”3\/4″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/4″][vc_column_text]9:30-11.00<\/strong>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”3\/4″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/4″][vc_column_text]11.15-12.45<\/strong>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”3\/4″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/4″][vc_column_text]8.00- 9.00<\/strong>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”3\/4″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/4″][vc_column_text]9:30-11.00<\/strong>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”3\/4″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/4″][vc_column_text]11.15-12.45<\/strong>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”3\/4″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/4″][vc_column_text]11.15-12.45<\/strong>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”3\/4″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/4″][vc_column_text]8.00- 9.00<\/strong>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”3\/4″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/4″][vc_column_text]9:30-11.00<\/strong>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”3\/4″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n Panel 1: New Forms of Delivering Public Goods and Inclusive Public Services: Enablers, Benefits, and Barriers<\/b><\/p>\n Chairs: Robert Krimmer, Trui Steen, Matteo Gerosa, Enrique Areizaga and Jon Shamah.<\/span><\/p>\n Panel 2: Democratizing co-production of sustainable public services<\/b><\/p>\n Chairs: Diego L\u00f3pez-de-Ipi\u00f1a, Taco Brandsen, Trui Steen, Pauli Misikangas, Daniel Sarasa, A. Paula Rodriguez M\u00fcller and Noella Edelmann.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Workshop 1:\u00a0 Trust and Distrust in eDemocracy<\/b><\/p>\n Chairs: David Duenas-Cid, Tomasz Janowski and Robert Krimmer<\/span><\/p>\n Workshop 2: Validating the rules of government automation<\/b><\/p>\n Chairs: Elsa Estevez, Tomasz Janowski and Benjamin David Roseth.<\/span><\/p>\n Workshop 3: A Framework for Public Service Co-Creation and Sustainability<\/b><\/p>\n Chairs: Noella Edelmann, A. Paula Rodriguez M\u00fcller, Natalia Oprea, Efthimios Tambouris and Trui Steen<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Chair: Catherine Duman & David Valle Cruz<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Track chairs: Helen K. Liu (National Taiwan University, Taiwan), Seok-jin Eom (Seoul National University, South-Korea), Lisa Schmidthuber (Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria).\u00a0<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n Foteini Vagena and Eriks Sneiders. Communication between Citizens and Public Organizations as a Means of Public Value Co-creation<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Track Chairs: Robert Krimmer (Tartu University, Estonia), Mihkel Solvak (Tartu University, Estonia) & Carsten Schmidt (Tartu University, Estonia)<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n Silvia Lips, Natalia Vinogradova, Robert Krimmer and Dirk Draheim. Re-Shaping the EU Digital Identity Framework<\/span><\/p>\n Andreas Schmitz, Ansgar Mondorf and Maria A. Wimmer. Framework for designing interoperable public service architectures with exemplification along small-scale procurement and PEPPOL<\/span><\/p>\n Federico Bartolomucci and Gianluca Bresolin. Fostering Data Collaboratives\u2019 systematisation through models\u2019 definition and research priorities setting<\/span><\/p>\n Andreea Ancuta Corici, Blaz Podgorelec, Thomas Zefferer, Detlef H\u00fchnlein, Jordi Cucurull, Hans Graux, Stefan Dedovic, Bogdan Romanov, Carsten Schmidt and Robert Krimmer. Enhancing European Interoperability Frameworks to Leverage Mobile Cross-Border Services in Europe<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Track chairs: Rony Medaglia (Copenhagen Business School, Denmark) & Gianluca Misuraca (Universidad Polit\u00e9cnica de Madrid, Spain)<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n Sapraz Mohamed and Shengnan Han. Translating Human Values to Design Requirements: The Case of Developing Digital Government Collaborative Platform (DGCP) for Environmental Sustainability in Sri Lanka<\/span><\/p>\n Selinde van Engelenburg, Boriana Rukanova, Jolien Ubacht, Siu Lie Tan, Yao-Hua Tan and Marijn Janssen. From requirements to a research agenda for governments governing reuse of critical raw materials in the circular economy<\/span><\/p>\n Rony Medaglia, Boriana Rukanova and Yao-Hua Tan. Digital Government and the Circular Economy: Towards an Analytical Framework<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Track chairs: Bettina Distel (University of M\u00fcnster, Germany), Hendrik Scholta (University of M\u00fcnster, Germany), & Tobias Brandt (University of M\u00fcnster, Germany)<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n Michael Koddebusch. Exposing the Phish: The Effect of Persuasion Techniques in Phishing E-Mails<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Track chairs: Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazan (Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Mexico) & J. Ignacio Criado (university of Madrid, Spain)<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n Kellyton Brito, Rogerio Silva Filho and Paulo Adeodato. Please stop trying to predict elections only with Twitter<\/span><\/p>\n Ignacio Criado, Juli\u00e1n Villodre and J. Ramon Gil-Garcia. Social media institutionalization in European local governments: a comparison of administrative traditions<\/p>\n Ehsan Ul Haq, Tristan Braud, Lik Hang Lee, Reza Hadi Mogavi, He Zhang and Pan Hui. Tips, Tidings, and Tech: Governmental Communication on Facebook During the COVID-19 Pandemic<\/span><\/p>\n Vincentius Homburg. Institutional Trust and Social Media Use in Citizen-State Relations: Results from an international cross country vignette study<\/span><\/p>\n Mashadi Ledwaba and Vukosi Marivate. Semi-supervised learning approaches for predicting South African political sentiment for local government elections<\/span><\/p>\n Arbi Chouikh, Ghofrane Medini, Sehl Mellouli, Sharon Straus and Christine Fahim. Managing the COVID-19 in Canada: Exploring the Twitter Communication by the government and health officials<\/span><\/p>\n Yuanyuan Guo. How Does Social Media Influence Government Trust Among Chinese Youth Groups? A Chain Mediation Study Based on Trust Theory and Planned Behavior Theory<\/span><\/p>\n Catherine Dumas. E-petitioning as Online Collective Action in We the People: The Case of the Legalization of Marijuana in the US<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Track chairs: Leonidas Anthopoulos (University of Thessaly, Greece), Dongwook Kim (Seoul National University, Korea) & Soon Ae Chun (City University of New York, USA<\/span><\/i>)<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n Mortaza S. Bargh, Maud van de Mosselaar, Paul Rutten and Sunil Choenni. On Using Privacy Labels for Visualizing the Privacy Practice of SMEs: Challenges and Research Directions<\/span><\/p>\n Hyesung Park, Jeong-Eun Seo and Hunyeong Kwon. Research for making smart city cybersecurity policy according to communication theory: Focus on the communication structure<\/span><\/p>\n Rachel Benchaya Gans, Letiane Beninc\u00e1, Lauro Andr\u00e9 Ribeiro, Tha\u00edsa Leal da Silva and Maur\u00edcio Kunz. Higher Education Courses related to Sustainable Smart Cities in Latin America<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Track chairs: Sehl Mellouli (Universit\u00e9 Laval, Canada), Marijn Janssen (Delft University of Technology) & Adegboyega Ojo (Maynooth University, Ireland)<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n Colin van Noordt. Conceptual challenges of researching Artificial Intelligence in public administrations: Definitional challenges and varying dimensions on the meaning of AI<\/span><\/p>\n Andr\u00e9s Segura-Tinoco, Andr\u00e9s Holgado-S\u00e1nchez, Iv\u00e1n Cantador, Mar\u00eda E. Cort\u00e9s-Cediel and Manuel Pedro Rodr\u00edguez Bol\u00edvar. A Conversational Agent for Argument-driven E-participation<\/span><\/p>\n Luis F. Luna-Reyes and Teresa Harrison. A Systems View of Enterprise Data Governance for Artificial Intelligence Applications in Government<\/span><\/p>\n Antonia Sattlegger, Nitesh Bharosa and Jeroen van den Hoven. Designing for responsibility \u2013 lessons learned from the use of AI in government<\/span><\/p>\n David Valle-Cruz, Rigoberto Garc\u00eda-Contreras and J. Patricia Mu\u00f1oz-Ch\u00e1vez. Mind the Gap: Towards an Understanding of Government Decision-Making based on Artificial Intelligence<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Track chairs: Charalampos Alexopoulos (University of the Aegean, Greece) & Shefali Virkar (Danube University Krems, Austria)<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n Auriane Marmier. The Impact of Data Governance on OGD Publication \u2013 An Ethnographic Odyssey<\/span><\/p>\n Mariia Maksimova, Art Alishani, Mihkel Solvak and Robert Krimmer. Automated impact assessment – how digitizing government enables rapid and tailor-made policy responses<\/span><\/p>\n Rafail Promikyridis and Efthimios Tambouris. Using Knowledge Graphs to provide public service information<\/span><\/p>\n Euripidis Loukis and Niki Kyriakou. Enhancing Firms\u2019 Financial Support Decision-Making with Predictions of Technological Resilience to Economic Crises<\/span><\/p>\n Beatriz Lanza, Maria Aparecida Oliveira, Yohanna Juk, Thiago \u00c1vila and Daniel Valotto. Does web page loading speed matter? An analysis in the Brazilian Public Service Portals<\/span><\/p>\n Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazan, Adrian Osiel Millan and Javier Cifuentes Faura. Towards a definition of a user profile in e-government: The Mexican and Spanish Cases<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Track chairs: Jing Zhang (Clark University, USA), Chris Hinnant (Florida State University, USA) & Lei Zheng (Fudan University, China)<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n Ini Kong, Marijn Janssen and Nitesh Bharosa. Challenges in the Transition towards a Quantum-safe Government<\/span><\/p>\n Wookjoon Sung and Jooho Lee. A Study on the Use of e-Government Services in Korea: Significance and Limitations of the E-Government Maturity Model<\/span><\/p>\n Rozha Ahmed, Omer Ahmed, Ingrid Pappel and Dirk Draheim. e-Court System Evaluation through the User’s Perspective: Applying the End-User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) Model<\/span><\/p>\n Yiwei Gong and Xinyi Yang. Outsource or Invest? A Multiple Case Study of Digital Government Platform Strategies<\/span><\/p>\n Tomas Lindroth, Johan Magnusson, Kristian Norling and Jacob Torell. Balancing the Digital Portfolio: Empirical evidence of an ambidextrous bias in digital government<\/span><\/p>\n Antonio Cordella and Francesco Gualdi. How Technology makes Institutions: the case of Peru<\/span><\/p>\n Aryamala Prasad. Institutional And Organizational Factors Influencing Bureaucratic Responsiveness In India<\/span><\/p>\n Chiara Leonardi and Elena Not. Challenges and Opportunities for ICT in Co-production: A Case Study of Public Service Innovation in an Italian Municipality<\/span><\/p>\n Stefan Stepanovic and Tobias Mettler. Safe return to the workplace: Perceived opportunities and threats in the use of health surveillance technologies in public administrations<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Track Chairs: Jolien Ubacht (Delft University of Technology), Svein \u00d8lnes (Western Norway Research Institute, Norway) & S\u00e9linde van Engelenburg (Delft University of Technology)<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n Stanislav Mahula, Mikael Lindquist, Livia Norstr\u00f6m and Juho Lindman. Digital transformation in local government organisations: empirical evidence from blockchain initiatives<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Track Chairs: Peter Parycek (Frauenhofer Fokus, Germany), Charalabidis Yannis (University of the Aegean, Greece) & Anna-Sophie Novak (Danube University Krems, Austria)<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n Ok Heo, Hee-jin Koo and Hun-Yeong Kwon. A Study on Privacy Protection of Mobile Evidence in Relation to Criminal Investigative Procedures – Focusing on the application of encryption technology during the collection and storage stage<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Track chairs: Beatriz Barreto Brasileiro Lanza (CTG SUNY & IDB, Brazil), Thiago Jos\u00e9 Tavares \u00c1vila ( Funda\u00e7\u00e3o Get\u00falio Vargas, Brazil), Maria Alexandra Cunha *Funda\u00e7\u00e3o Get\u00falio Vargas, Brazil)<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n Kristian Norling, Tomas Lindroth, Johan Magnusson and Jacob Torell. Digital Decoupling: A Population Study of Digital Transformation Strategies in Swedish Municipalities<\/span><\/p>\n Ida Lindgren and Christian \u00d8stergaard Madsen. Understanding Citizen Actions in Public Encounters – Towards a Multi-Channel Process Model<\/span><\/p>\n Glauco Vitor Pedrosa, Andrea Judice, Marcelo Judice, Leonardo Ara\u00fajo, Fabiola Fleury and Rejane Figueiredo. Applying User-Centered Design on Digital Transformation of Public Services: A Case Study in Brazil<\/span><\/p>\n Beatriz Barreto Brasileiro Lanza, Thiago Jos\u00e9 Tavares \u00c1vila and Daniel Valotto. An Overview of Rede.gov.br as a Federative Mechanism for Digital Government Development in Brazil<\/span><\/p>\n Noella Edelmann and Ines Mergel. The Implementation of a Digital Strategy in the Austrian Public Sector<\/span><\/p>\n Yi-Fan Wang. Existence and Intentionality of Digital Transformation in Public Organizations: A Phenomenological Perspective<\/span><\/p>\n Tzuhao Chen, J. Ramon Gil-Garcia and Mila Gasco-Hernandez. Cross-Boundary Information Sharing Flows in Emergency Management: Proposing a Conceptual Framework<\/span><\/p>\n Christos Ziozias and Leonidas Anthopoulos. Forming Smart Governance under a City Digital Transformation Strategy – findings from Greece and ICC<\/span>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" [vc_row][vc_column width=”1\/4″][vc_wp_custommenu nav_menu=”129″][\/vc_column][vc_column width=”3\/4″][vc_column_text] Keynote speakers [\/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/2″][vc_single_image image=”5960″ img_size=”full” add_caption=”yes” alignment=”center”][vc_column_text]Title: Blockchain, its Applications: the Past, the Present and the Future Possibilities and Challenges for Governments[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text] Olivier Rikken – Ledger Leopold Bio:\u00a0Olivier Rikken MSc MBA is an often asked\u00a0 keynote speaker on blockchain, Smart Contracts and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs). Throughout his career he […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":596,"featured_media":0,"parent":5704,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pagelayer_contact_templates":[],"_pagelayer_content":"","iawp_total_views":74,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-5942","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dgsociety.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5942"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dgsociety.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dgsociety.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dgsociety.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/596"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dgsociety.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5942"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/dgsociety.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5942\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5970,"href":"https:\/\/dgsociety.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5942\/revisions\/5970"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dgsociety.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5704"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dgsociety.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5942"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Tentative conference programme<\/h3>\n
\n15 juni 2022<\/strong><\/h4>\n
\n
\n
\n
16 juni 2022<\/strong><\/h4>\n
\n
\n
\n
17 juni 2022<\/strong><\/h4>\n
\n
\n
\n
Panels<\/b><\/h3>\n
Workshops<\/b><\/h3>\n
Poster sessions\u00a0<\/b><\/h3>\n
\n
TRACK 1: Collaborative Intelligence: Humans, Crowds, and Machines<\/b><\/h4>\n
TRACK 2: Cross-border governance and service impact assessment<\/b><\/h4>\n
TRACK 3: Digital Government and Sustainable Development Goals\u00a0<\/b><\/h4>\n
TRACK 4: Human-centric innovation in smart cities<\/b><\/h4>\n
TRACK 5: Social Media and Government\u00a0<\/b><\/h4>\n
TRACK 6: Sustainable Smart Cities<\/b><\/h4>\n
TRACK 7: Artificial Intelligence for Governments of the Future<\/b><\/h4>\n
TRACK 9: Data-driven Governance through Information Retrieval and Decision Support Systems<\/b><\/h4>\n
TRACK 11: Organizational Factors, Adoption Issues and Digital Government Impacts<\/b><\/h4>\n
TRACK 12. Blockchain-based applications for e-Government<\/b><\/h4>\n
TRACK 13. Legal Informatics<\/b><\/h4>\n
Track 14. Digital Transformation in Governments<\/b><\/h4>\n